Your explicit words have not demonstrated you don’t believe x. Your explicit words express a view very, very close to x. A view that seems, to me, carefully presented.
I didn’t say anything about how reality works. If there’s something I said that violates fundamental laws of physics, please, explain, instead of simply asserting I did so.
There is no topic. You claimed I said a thing. I said no. You said “yeah but you were thinking it”. I said no. You said “I reject your reality”. So here we are. Nothing further to discuss, except perhaps how ridiculous your approach to dealing with the world is.
Your explicit words have not demonstrated you don’t believe x. Your explicit words express a view very, very close to x. A view that seems, to me, carefully presented.
That’s not how reality works.
I didn’t say anything about how reality works. If there’s something I said that violates fundamental laws of physics, please, explain, instead of simply asserting I did so.
Or, better yet, let’s get back on topic.
There is no topic. You claimed I said a thing. I said no. You said “yeah but you were thinking it”. I said no. You said “I reject your reality”. So here we are. Nothing further to discuss, except perhaps how ridiculous your approach to dealing with the world is.
You’ve said most homeless people don’t want a home. This is demonstrably untrue, and blames them for their own suffering.