Drew@sopuli.xyzM to ProgrammingCircleJerk@programming.dev · edit-22 days ago100 concurrent users = 8640000/daysopuli.xyzimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up144arrow-down1image100 concurrent users = 8640000/daysopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to ProgrammingCircleJerk@programming.dev · edit-22 days agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
url: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/umar482_i-just-fired-a-potential-client-with-zero-activity-7303399019093897218-YTg9
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·edit-22 days ago<unjerk> I don’t know if this person is joking, and it scares me. The wall of text in the original post makes me feel like they’re not. why I find this funny This implies there are 100 unique users every second </unjerk>
minus-squareDannyBoy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoThe 53+ startups seems like a joke. If you’re not rounding why use the + and not the exact number? Along with this strange interpretation of concurrent users.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 hours agoThey’re starting up so many startups they don’t have time to adjust their bio every time a new one pops up.
<unjerk>I don’t know if this person is joking, and it scares me. The wall of text in the original post makes me feel like they’re not.why I find this funny
This implies there are 100 unique users every second
</unjerk>The 53+ startups seems like a joke. If you’re not rounding why use the + and not the exact number? Along with this strange interpretation of concurrent users.
They’re starting up so many startups they don’t have time to adjust their bio every time a new one pops up.