Nemeski@lemm.ee to Firefox@lemmy.world · 3 months agoMozilla’s approach to Manifest V3: What’s different and why it matters for extension usersblog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down10cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkMozilla’s approach to Manifest V3: What’s different and why it matters for extension usersblog.mozilla.orgNemeski@lemm.ee to Firefox@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square45linkfedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 months agoIts nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.
minus-squareFlagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI’ve already been on Waterfox for years, personally.
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agowaterfox does not use manifest?
minus-squareFlagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI don’t understand; are you asking a question?
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoyeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.
minus-squareFlagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI haven’t limited into it much, but I don’t see why not!
Its nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.
I’ve already been on Waterfox for years, personally.
waterfox does not use manifest?
I don’t understand; are you asking a question?
yeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.
I haven’t limited into it much, but I don’t see why not!