• jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Having a retirement age of 67 should be seen as a complete failure of our society. Boeing did a study that found if their employees retired at 55, then they collected retirement benefits on average for 25 years - dying at 80 years old.

      However, those that retired at 65 only collected retirement benefits for 2 years 18 months - dying at 67. Basically meaning that for every year you work past 55, you’re missing out on 2 years of retirement (working an extra year and also taking a year off your life).

      A retirement age of 67 is basically the same as having no retirement age at all. It’s just a “fuck you, work till you die.”

      Edit: Seems like this might not be true

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Couldn’t this just be an indirect way of saying people with more money live longer? Retiring at 55 means you’re pretty well off, retiring at 67 likely means you couldn’t afford to retire early. Less money means lower ability to afford healthy food and medical care.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s just go ahead and dispense with this nonsense that healthy food is “expensive”. The produce section at the grocery store is incredibly inexpensive. You can get a whole single serving meal for $1-3.