…As an example, there seems to be no global consensus on such fundamental questions as when we regulate using the carrot and when we employ the stick. In his seminal book, Code, Lawrence Lessig noted that something like mandatory Internet ID cards would be a political impossibility (at least in the US), despite their utility in increasing the traceability of actions performed on the internet. Instead, he points out the ease of creating incentives for individuals to voluntarily register for an Internet ID by making life significantly easier [2] for those who do so (similar to how a driver’s license is not required, but life is difficult without one). The legacy internet, by virtue of its current structure in which intermediaries play an integral role, contains a series of chokepoints that work well for applying the regulatory thumbscrews.
https://global.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/penn-global/goc22-youngblom-thoughtpiece.pdf
Fucking hate busy bodies that need to know what I’m doing so much.
Like in Australia to rent a house you don’t have to use their “app” for an application to put all you “data” in, you can use a paper application, but they will probably throw it n the bin because they don’t want to enter all the data and you won’t get a rental, “optional” digital ID is just around the corner, you don’t have to use it but you will probably be “overlooked”. We recently had to fill a application via and app they even wanted a photo of your pet…
Monero can be regulated and, for tax purposes, handled similar to cash transactions.
>Instead, he points out the ease of creating incentives for individuals to voluntarily register for an Internet ID by making life significantly easier \[2\] for those who do so (similar to how a driver’s license is not required, but life is difficult without one).
This is also called “nudging”. It is an important mass-control tool the modern techno-industrial-media state has.
http://ybgg2evrcdz37y2qes23ff3wjqjdn33tthgoagi76vhxytu4mpxiz5qd.onion/wiki/Nudge_theory?lang=en