andypiper@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMastodon 4.2 released, with (opt-in) search, and UX improvementsblog.joinmastodon.orgexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1245arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: mastodon@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlselfhost@lemmy.mlwolnyinternet@szmer.infofediverse@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldmastodon@lemmy.world
arrow-up1245arrow-down1external-linkMastodon 4.2 released, with (opt-in) search, and UX improvementsblog.joinmastodon.organdypiper@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: mastodon@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlselfhost@lemmy.mlwolnyinternet@szmer.infofediverse@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldmastodon@lemmy.world
Lots of small improvements across the user experience, and opt-in search, make this an important release.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWhich privacy when it comes to posts explicitly tagged as public?
minus-squarepetunia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou’re conflating tagging a post as public so that it is publicly accessible as being the same thing as consenting to being indexed in a search engine.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAnd why wouldn’t this be the same thing? Public content I public content. 3rd party services can already access the posts.
Which privacy when it comes to posts explicitly tagged as public?
You’re conflating tagging a post as public so that it is publicly accessible as being the same thing as consenting to being indexed in a search engine.
And why wouldn’t this be the same thing? Public content I public content. 3rd party services can already access the posts.