Tech company faces negligence lawsuit after Philip Paxson died from driving off a North Carolina bridge destroyed years ago
Discuss!
Tech company faces negligence lawsuit after Philip Paxson died from driving off a North Carolina bridge destroyed years ago
Discuss!
So the lawsuit has merit? Because it does. And Google is culpable.
Not necessarily. Firstly because I don’t actually think there is any requirement that maps are 100% accurate, Google never a claim made anywhere that they are flawless. Secondly because if the city / town / local authority hasn’t put up signs, it’s entirely possible that they haven’t informed map makers either.
So map makers are not responsible for inaccuracies in their map, and even if they were responsible, they may not have been told.
There’s levels of culpability and in this scenario Google seem to be right at the bottom, if on the list at all.
So what you’re saying is that Google is on the list, and has some culpability.
It doesn’t fucking matter that they don’t have ALL of it. It only matters that they have SOME of it and all you dumb fucks keep saying that they do but that the lawsuit doesn’t have merit. But it does, because they do, and you all agree. Have yall never studied law before??
I don’t think you know how the law works. Google are not legally required to have accurate maps.
Ethically maybe (although even then it’s highly debatable), but not legally so, no, the lawsuit has no merit
You randomly arguing the point doesn’t change reality
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence
Not really. I think they have a part of the responsibility but as with previous similar cases, I don’t think they’ll see any legal consequences.
You just said they have some responsibility. Do they or don’t they??
Not sure what part of my comment makes you unsure on what I think. Yes they have some responsibility.