• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    That makes little sense. If they can get my certificate then I have different problems that ,a 6 day turnaround isn’t going to solve

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        … Seriously?

        If someone got a hold of your certificate that is the security equivalent of the entire company being on fire. If they got my certs they likely will have my credit cards, my birth certificate, and my youngest daughter.

        Thank God though that I can renew my certificates every 6 days, that will definitely help sole the problem.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          OK. Whatever hypothetical we want to think about here, we still want our cert to be renewed.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah and that is something everyone already is doing anyway, I never said anything about not doing that.

            I said that lowering the amount of days to 6 won’t do anything to increase security. Then why not lowering it to 1 day? That ought to be super secure now! Why not 1 hour or 1 minute? Super duper secure?

            What is the actual added security benefit here? Because so far all I’ve seen is security theatre, something unexpected from let’sencrypt

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Thats an interesting position.

          I dont keep my credit card information on the load balancer that holds my certs.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Missing bthe point that of they got access to that, they likely have access to a lot more and that you likely have bigger problems than just your SSL certs

          • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            I think the implication is the infiltrator would have a lot of access already.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Indeed not, it’s how real life works, as there is more to lige than just SSL. If someone has access to your SSL certificates you have a ginormous set of issues, your easily replaceable SSL certificates being one of the lowest priority. I don’t see how a 6 day limit on that is going to do anything at all to help you with safety

        • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yeah but it’s just an extra layer. Why not, it’s automated and almost no-cost.