I just can’t, and sadly it’s worst in Linux community. Like dude’s face hair makes him look 45, but no, he does a desktop with a cringy looking 15 old anime girl. (That, on top of hiz annoyingly high pitched voice but whatever) I just stop watching the video on the spot, it’s beyond dumb.

The stupid NSFW tag on Lemmy? I turned it ON to occasionally see boobs, not some drawn pictures of underage kiddo, this pisses me off so much, JUST FCKING STAHP with this shit.

I have an impression suddenly, in a span of 2 years everyone started to jerk off on that bullshit and are proud to show it

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it’s a fantasy involving a drawing that could represent anything. If they’re not actually attracted to real kids, they’re not a pedophile.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, for a lot of people it’s not actual kids. So I don’t know what to tell you

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The same thing furries represent. Just characters, that don’t necessarily have an age, or gender, or species. It’s the abstract representation of something you can project onto for various fantasies. Maybe they like that they’re small, or cute, but don’t necessarily relate it to a real life kid. When I look at furry stuff I’m not thinking about it in terms of real animals. They’re completely different and they only bear a superficial resemblance to animals, just like an anime character only bears a superficial resemblance to a human.

                • Fal@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Again, nothing, that’s my point, they’re all friggen drawings, and don’t necessarily correlate to anything real. This whole argument is about assigning an arbitrary number to a drawing. And unless you’re going to tell me that liking yiff makes you into bestiality, you understand my point and can stop asking questions.

                  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Pretty interesting that those people are looking specifically for that certain category of material and that such a category exists separate from regular anime characters when nothing separates them from the rest of the anime characters.

                    you understand my point and can stop asking questions.

                    I’m not actually asking those questions to know the answer, it’s just to see you running around in circles trying to avoid the obvious conclusion. Lolis are lolis because they’re supposed to be recognized as kids, for their age and looks. People who specifically look out for material featuring drawn children in sexual situations or just in general to jerk off to it is looking at that material because they’re drawn and identified as kids. Person who is sexually into that type of stuff is a pedophile. You’re going around and around saying “but it’s drawn, it doesn’t mean anything”. Yeah, it doesn’t mean anything that they’re specifically looking for drawn stuff featuring children. It doesn’t suddenly stop mattering when it’s drawn.

                    And unless you’re going to tell me that liking yiff makes you into bestiality,

                    If you’re looking for stuff featuring animals meant to look like animals and jerking off to that then I have bad news for you.