Wanted to ask about this. I do not work in California, however many of our vendors and customers are seeking to swap to MIL-PRF-8625 Type II, when they historically used Type I.

I’m totally on board with this - anything I can do to push safer, less environmentally destructive processes is a win in my book. But I understand that not all companies are interested in jumping ship so fast.

So I wanted to ask, what’s your companies take on it? Did you know about the industry phase out?

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I didn’t, but we’ve opted for chem film lately. Old timers seemed more fond of hex chrome for high voltage applications with outdoor exposure, but I don’t see why it’s better than chem film.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Being in California ive already had to update lots of old part drawings to call out type II a few years ago. Being that no one above me in the company seemed to give a shit about engineering besides being able to meet the sales numbers, i did it on my own because none of the vendors would quote the parts with the old drawing and our California address

    • Alteon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m doing the same thing over here in Virginia. Even though it’s a California initiative, it’s having an effect over here as well.

      • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I love California for leading the way on stuff like this and glad it has a bigger impact. Someone’s gotta reduce the immense toxic chemicals workers are inundated with because companies certainly don’t care