X sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisions::X decried law’s “draconian financial penalties” up to $15K per violation per day.

  • spacecadet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This may be the one time I side with X. This seems like a massive first amendment right violation. Why did California choose to start now and not years ago when this became a problem. What constitutes a social media company? How will the government decide to regulate what is “controversial”. This law seems strange with a lot of gaping holes.

    • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How will the government decide to regulate what is “controversial”. This law seems strange with a lot of gaping holes

      I guess it’s defined in the law. Did you read it ?