moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agoBitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concernswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1342arrow-down110 cross-posted to: bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.dephoronix@lemmy.world
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkBitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concernswww.phoronix.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square82fedilink cross-posted to: bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.dephoronix@lemmy.world
minus-squarekurcatovium@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agoBitwarden client is FOSS same as Keepass, though. Why aren’t you afraid of Keepass having backdoor by “insert whatever big corporation sponsoring FOSS” giving said companies free access to your passwords you happily store in their clouds?
minus-squareLlewellyn@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agoKeepass could have backdoors too. The difference is: authors of those backdoors are not from the same company, which I use as cloud storage.
Bitwarden client is FOSS same as Keepass, though. Why aren’t you afraid of Keepass having backdoor by “insert whatever big corporation sponsoring FOSS” giving said companies free access to your passwords you happily store in their clouds?
Keepass could have backdoors too. The difference is: authors of those backdoors are not from the same company, which I use as cloud storage.