moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agoBitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concernswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1342arrow-down110 cross-posted to: bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.dephoronix@lemmy.world
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkBitwarden Makes Change To Address Recent Open-Source Concernswww.phoronix.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square82fedilink cross-posted to: bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.dephoronix@lemmy.world
minus-squaredrspod@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 days ago Nothing in the licensing scheme changed, at all. This statement is incorrect. The SDK had specific source files placed exclusively under the SDK license, and the remainder of the repository dual licensed between GPL 3 and the SDK license. So the licensing scheme did change. See also: https://github.com/bitwarden/sdk-internal/blob/main/LICENSE
This statement is incorrect. The SDK had specific source files placed exclusively under the SDK license, and the remainder of the repository dual licensed between GPL 3 and the SDK license. So the licensing scheme did change.
See also: https://github.com/bitwarden/sdk-internal/blob/main/LICENSE