👆 title

what’s the reason behind the 1st rule?

    • Draconic NEO@pawb.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      First two I definitely agree on, it does result in low-quality, low-effort spam, since they can be generated easily and people often post it automatically for a bigger boost.

      Last one really does depend. Open.ai and the like absolutely are. Community driven open source projects, not so much. Actually I really admire and appreciate the work that @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com has been doing with the AI-horde. It’s actually pretty amazing. Especially their CSAM defense system, which really can be beneficial for Fediverse admins to clear out potentially harmful content from their pict-rs database without having to see and experience it themselves.

          • Draconic NEO@pawb.socialM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            I can agree that some of them, especially the more well crafted ones can be great quality. As an example here’s one of the samples I generated for the icon of the future AI dragons community.

            AI generated Dragon image

            Though unfortunately the same cannot be said for most of them. I should know since I’ve reviewed quite a few of them on AI Horde, mostly for the points but also because it can show you what people are generating. There were a decent number of good ones coming through, but a lot were extremely malformed and some were even just noise. And that translates to people posting a lot of funky and messed up ones.

            • merde alors@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              i like “funky and messed up” but i had this one for this group before reading the 1st rule

              simple but correct :

              • Draconic NEO@pawb.socialM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                Even these are still much better quality than a lot of the stuff I’ve seen in the review area. A lot of which is basically unrecognizable, one of them I saw seemed like it was trying to make an animal of some kind but it was so malformed I couldn’t tell what it was supposed to be, or if the things in the background were supposed to be trees, buildings, or mountains.

        • Draconic NEO@pawb.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          He wanted to understand why, that doesn’t mean he can’t point out if it is wrong, or situationally dependent.