• 31 Posts
  • 1.65K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle


  • first of all, this disagreements just focuses on the ‘birth’ part, which is not the main part of my original statement. Replace ‘place of birth’ with ‘place of education’ or ‘origins’ and you got the same result.

    Fair enough.

    last, being born male can also comes with innate disadvantages (less tolerance to pain, less flexibility) and acquired disadvantages (less elegance, more competition), not even including the hardship of being trans in our societies and the impacts of transition treatments. ‘Male chromosomes advantages’ mostly are strength and endurance, which are not the only factor in sports.

    So you do acknowledge that there are innate differences between males and females, although you prefer to focus on the disadvantages rather than the advantages.

    Plus most of the factors that disadvantage women in sports come from social background rather than biological ones.

    I would agree with that statement. But that still means that if you equalized the social differences, the biological ones would remain. Although it would be a much smaller discrepancy, it still wouldn’t be an even playing field. It’s just unfair, and that bothers me.

    And in the end, we cannot observe an overwhelming winrate in favor of trans athletes.

    This isn’t a topic where the statistics are helpful whatsoever. The sample size is way too small, and there isn’t any control group, so the relative performance of transgender athletes could be significantly affected by any number of variables aside from their transgender status.







  • I am being condescending because I consider your perspective to be naive and short sighted.

    You’re a person who makes judgments about others based on hearsay and attacks them without even doing a bare minimum of research to validate whether the rumors you heard were true. You’re a person who is more than happy to calumniate others for little to no reason while being oblivious to your own flaws.

    In my view, users who believe the world revolves around them and relentlessly attack and shame anyone who doesn’t accept their version of reality are a much bigger obstacle to the growth of Lemmy than the tankie reputation. Many tankies fit that description, but so do many non-tankies, such as yourself in this case.

    As someone who possesses open-mindedness and empathy, it’s incredibly frustrating to watch so many lemmings act so self-righteous and judgmental towards each other, while pretending their own shit doesn’t stink. I’m trying to help contribute and build towards a diverse and healthy online forum for open intellectual discussion, but it seems that the vast majority of people are too immature to realize such a goal.


  • Depending on the sport it can have. Come and try to beat some of the old ones of my town to a game of Pétanque, i guarantee you being born in France would help you.

    If someone was born in France but then moved to another country as an infant and grew up somewhere else, they wouldn’t have any advantage at Petanque as a result of being born in France. Thus we can easily observe that the location of birth is not a significant factor in determining ability, but rather the socialization that occurs as a young person can be a factor. We can use the birth location as an imperfect proxy for making assumptions about developmental experiences, but it’s not a direct influence.

    In contrast, if someone were born with an XY genotype (male) and socialized as a female from birth, that person would still possess inherent athletic advantages over females. Biological sex has a direct influence over the physical characteristics of an organism.

    It’s not a slight difference, it’s a fundamental difference that makes your comparison flawed.