• 63 Posts
  • 2K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 13th, 2023

help-circle




  • Lemmy has such a bad understanding of capitalism.

    1. that’s the united states of america. Not the UK.

    2. Lobbying isn’t capitalism. The government needs to be involved in capitalism.

    But finally, finally after all that. The core is energy production is not a monopoly it is a largely free market where many businesses and even many countries can create energy production in the UK. Home owners, co-ops, France nuclear, Norwegian hydro, gas, wind.

    What you are talking about is electrical distribution being a natural monopoly. The National Grid (Great Britain) is largely a single monopoly but that’s not where the price comes from. The UK has a lot of oversight of that and inter connectors and offshore wind leases and even maximum pricing. How are companies going to shaft consumers when the UK government limits the amount they can sell for.













  • electric vehicle (EV) drivers to wait in line for hours at charging stations last month; some even found themselves stranded when their battery died while they waited in the queues.

    I’m sure “some” ICE cars have also ran out of fuel while queueing, seems like a bit of a nothing statement. More stations are needed and range does get lower in colder conditions that is known. Waiting until you have 30 miles left when you know electric cars lose 15% of range isn’t smart.

    Norway does winter testing on their vehicles and I’m sure people ask other people about car performance.

    https://www.naf.no/elbil/elbil-nytt/ev-range-and-charge-test

    Hydrogen is largely useless. It’s an electric car with extra steps and low density fuel and difficult storage conditions.

    Sure if you driving across the outback and need lightweight and fast charging there might be uses for it. But when you got 300 miles of range and live in a city why would hydrogen be better? You actually have to go to a station if nothing else rather than just charging where you park.

    Hydrogen is ultimately more inefficient in time and energy and cost so it’s going to lose.





  • There always a grid cost and solar energy is always cheapest when there is more solar power. Additionally users of electricity largely want fixed prices not wholesale prices.

    So how do you expect people putting solar on their houses to pay fair share of, low energy value, grid costs, inertia and frequency control, higher prices at peak?

    I’m all for solar but there is no way solar producers should get prices at peak time when they producing at off peak time with high supply and getting free additional costs.