• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2023

help-circle

  • https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_

    Soviet period (1979–1989) Edit After a Soviet-backed left-wing government in Afghanistan failed to gain popular support, the Soviets decided to invade. A number of resistance leaders concentrated on increasing opium production in their regions to finance their operations, regardless of its haram Islamic status, in particular Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Mullah Nasim Akhundzada, and Ismat Muslim. The production was doubled to 575 metric tons between 1982 and 1983.[15][16] (At this time the United States was pursuing an “arms-length” supporting strategy of the Mujahideen, the main purpose of which was to cripple the Soviet Union slowly into withdrawal through attrition rather than effect a quick and decisive overthrow.) Hekmatyar, the leading recipient of aid from the CIA and Pakistan, developed at least six heroin refineries in Koh-i-Sultan in southwestern Pakistan, while other warlords were content to sell raw opium. Nasim Akhundzada, who controlled the traditional poppy growing region of northern Helmand, issued quotas for opium production, which he was even rumoured to enforce with torture and extreme violence. To maximise control of trafficking, Nasim maintained an office in Zahidan, Iran.[17]


  • The USSR was there to oppose the US by fighting their proxies and defend the socialists in Afghanistan who supported them during the invasion.

    Yes.

    And also they wanted to protect thier trade and their borders from other imperialsts.

    Why cant it be both?

    Why are you unable to recognize that USSR could invade Afghanistan to protect socialst and to protect trade and secure thier borders?

    Why cant you just admit that the USSR did some unsavory things? Do you think they are a perfect embodiment of communism?

    They assassinated the communist president of Afghanistan before they invaded!

    All othet arguments aside i dont support governments who use assassination that way.


  • Its bullshit to paint an invasion as aid. This is what imperialist do.

    The soviets invaded afaganistan for the same reasons as the us did later and Briton did before.

    To protect their borders from afar,

    To create and protect trade deal favorable to their country,

    To spread their ideology.

    And by the way I read a book about the history of afaganistan called: Games Without Rules: The Often Interrupted History of Afghanistan.

    It outlined how the three main invasion of Afghanistan all followed the same basic lines, motivations and results. They devastated Afghanistan and created a situation where they would be invaded again.


  • It’s not about who does it, it’s about the objectives of the invasion.

    Lol do you hear yourself?

    Tankie bullshit friend.

    Afghanistan did not want to be invaded. The Afghans fought with the soviets through guerilla warfare for a decade.

    You sound just like Americans justifying the US invasion that would happen later.



  • MLs like you are the reason I am an anarchist.

    You asked for more communists i support and I listed some and now Im anti-communist because I don’t support the ones who created police states. Were you just waiting for me to engage so you could call that?

    Lol you make me want to call more people like you tankies because it is so applicable.

    MLs who think the only path to revolution is thru police states, are authoritarian by nature.


  • Sankara isn’t a non-tankie just because he didn’t live to the tankie phase, he was always acting as an ML.

    I believe there is a difference in being ML and having police state aspirations/trending authoritarian. Which is when I use the term tankie.

    Maybe I’m wrong tho you tell me. I liked what sankara did and I dont want to negate the cool things he did simply becuase he got murdered and we dont know what he was going to become.

    There is nuance in his life that I can accept. But what I cannot accept is modern day MLs who look fondly on the actions of the USSR, russian federation and the modern day CPC. they are large authoritarian states that I cannot support as an anarchist.

    Everytime I bring this up tho. I get called a lib.




  • By all measures, you should hate Sankara as well. Be consistent.

    i dont think. so sankara did some really cool things.

    The USSR did some cool things too , AT FIRST: then they started murdering anarchist and consolidating power and becoming a police state. As an anarchist I oppose this.

    Maybe Sankara would have done the same if he lived. But he didn’t. He was murdered in a US back coup. He was murdered for being an anti imperialist.

    The USSR is not anti imperialst. Neither is the CPC. These communists experiments became police states. Sankara didnt.

    Sankara fought for nitrution, literacy anticorruption anti imperialism. He put more women in government snd fought against female genital mutilation. Anarchist support all of these things.

    What we dont support is police states. Among other things.



  • Do you have any arguments besides calling me a lib? You’ve done this like 15 times.

    If you have such a problem with being called a tankie, its kinda hypocritical to call me a lib. Imo.

    Im not a liberal. Im an anarchist. anarchist also use this term to describe the way the USSR acted toward the Anarchists of the spainish civil war.



  • Sprinklebump@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlRemember me comrades!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok great. Honestly I’m getting tired & running out of steam arguing with people.

    Truth is this. When one of the first big lemmy jumps from reddit came I heard that hexbear was cool a leftist space. so hopped on. I was honestly disgusted by the comments i saw. I saw so many people arguing blindly for CPC and DPRK. Saying they were better than the US and calling anybody critiquing the bold claims they were making libs. such as “Cpc is the future socialism.” And "all the bad things people say about the CPC is american propaganda. "

    Basically same thing that happend here when I defined tankie as authoritarian communist . In fact I saw this kind of thing on reddit too alot.

    I dont give a fuck what you say or what other commenters post. I’ve seen this phenomena myself. I’ve been called a lib, So many times, simply for posting that I don’t support Russia or the CPC in leftist spaces. I’m sick of it.

    So what are we arguing about? Is hexbear not as bad as I thought it was? Ok cool. Im wrong.

    I know there are people in “your” community that are actual tankies. I’ve argued with them myself. Are you trying to say these people don’t exist? Cuz If you are, You’re the one that is full shit.

    There anything else you want to debate about?


  • Disagree.

    In fact I find it is a better measure of oppressive goverment than most indicators.

    What you really mean to say is most goverments are oppressive and authoritarian. Show me a country with a large prison population and I will show you an authoritarian country.

    Please see the zapatistas. For non police state goverment.



  • I think your use of authoritarian is idealist nonsense

    I disagree it has real implications usually the existence of a police state.

    I am an anarchist . I am against police states.

    China russia and the USA are all police states. They all suck. They all oppress their own people and others.

    There is much nuance. But my beliefs boiled down to a sentence is this:

    Fuck police States and fuck the people who support them.