You must be thinking of Börne.

More like nein charger cables, amirite Damen?

Thanks! Looks like they recycled their OG name last month.

While there has been a taboo against the changing of borders in Africa due to legitimate reasons, it became accepted that South Sudan should be created

Wut.

What is going on with the passive voice here? With whom has there been this taboo, and why did they think they had the power or legitimacy to define borders in the first place? The Berlin Conference? This sounds like 19th century white man’s burden shit.

♬ It’s like raaayaiiin on your wedding day ♬

It is true. Previously:

• Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?

Russia is better but still shitty. It’s closer to the US.

His fortune is yet to be known. He may yet move in next door to Juan Guaidó. But then again…

He’ll destroy your real power now that he’s crushed all your soft power.

I’m only familiar with the web interface. You might try using a browser to change your settings.

You’re projecting US strategy onto China. The Atlantic, 2021: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth

Well that’s annoying.

• LLM> also dont use em dashes
• It can be hard to know how much a writer relied on an LLM or how much revising/editing/proofreading they did before publishing, especially on topics you’re not versed in.
• These tells are going to get harder to clock very quickly.
• If you want your work to be taken seriously by people who understand the limitations of LLMs, then you should edit for tells (or don’t use one).
• People adopt conventions, and these LLMs are making pervasive the overuse of this phraseology. The influence is dialectical.

Not a straw man: you did indeed use “pro-Russia voices” as a bullshit dismissal.

Sounds like you have a “don’t show me nsfw posts” setting that you need to change. How you do that depends on your client.

I don’t know what exactly is going on there right now, but among the possibilities I can think of, perhaps these are Salafi Jihadists who got pushed out of Niger and went over the border. That’s one of the least nefarious reasons the US might be attacking.

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: It’s just an opinion piece / analysis. There either needs to be a tag for these or removal

Investigative journalism is just like your opinion, man.

pro-russia voices

You are begging the question.

1. Russian voices are full of shit.
2. This person said something that Russians have also said.
3. This person is a Russian voice.
4. This person is full of shit.

 
If Hitler said the sky is blue, would that make it not blue? Relatedly, Philosophy professor Hans-Georg Moeller explains the worrisome new German concept of the “Versteher”, or “understander”.

Go back to arguring for Jill Stein for president or how pete heagseth is tell the truth about Ukraine.

I never argued for anyone to vote for Stein, and I don’t even know what Hegseth has to say about Ukraine. You must listen to him more than me.

Your mom was sick because she swallowed a whole bunch of pills, and she refuses to talk about it because she doesn’t want her children to know about her suicide attempt. If I were you, I would never bring it up again.

Also, drugs aren’t a scam.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_Taiwan

As of January 2024, the ROC has formal diplomatic relations with 11 of the 193 United Nations member states

Oh hah, my bad. This is happening not far from the border with Niger. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokoto_State

It would hardly be the first time we’ve attacked—or claimed to attack—Islamic Jihadi terrorist cells. ISIS is providing a pretext for the US to intervene against Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso developing genuine sovereignty.

The terrorist groups are essentially chaos monkeys who are there to destabilize the region, similar to how they did (or tried to do) in Afghanistan, Xinjiang, and Syria.

What went unmentioned in Biden’s celebration of the fall of Assad was the role the U.S. played in the Syrian civil war. In addition to openly supporting and arming Kurdish-led forces, the CIA ran a covert program to arm and train so-called “moderate rebels” from the Free Syrian Army in the early years of the war at an estimated cost of roughly $1 billion a year. Over the past decade, the U.S. has carried out airstrikes in Syria, primarily against ISIS forces, and is believed to have continued its clandestine training and arming of opposition forces.