Nice username btw.

Ich bin da neutral, ich kaufe einfach kein Auto. Aber wenn ich mal wieder genug Geld für ein Fahrrad über habe und ich motiviert bin, mir ein Fahrrad zu kaufen, wird es bunt.

Weniger Autos insgesamt ist einfach auch h noch netter als bunte Autos.

Do you really want to say they weren’t? Do you really want to deny my experiences?

Edit: don’t bother answering, I’m blocking you. I don’t like people referring to middle aged people as ‘kids’ and I don’t like people doubting others’ experiences without any knowledge about said experiences.

I have no idea what you are talking about in your first two paragraphs.

So - answering your question, I don’t remember a single DS9 episode right now, just my impression of their structure and level of complexity.

Maybe you can have another go. Especially the Dominion War episodes are really good, but also there are other really good episodes.

Rogue One and Andor are fine, but I wouldn’t call them some of the best Star Wars made

They are though. They are definitely better than the prequels and arguably at least as good as the OT, at least from a story telling and movie making perspective.

Andor doesn’t show failure though, it shows how fascist systems work and how fascism affects the ‘little people’.

Wdym? Star Trek 2009 was an okay movie and Beyond was actually fine. Also I can absolutely recommend Strange New World and Prodigy. Lower Decks can also be fun if you’re into fan service.

Merz schlägt vor, nebenbei zu arbeiten 😬

I don’t get it, it’s like we watched two different Star Trek franchises. And while producing some real bullcrap, new Star Wars has some of the best Star Wars ever produced with Rogue One and Andor (also, Rebels is surprisingly good).

Also I do think virtue signalling and identity political do have some value to some capacity.

But calling DS9 ‘too morally sterile’ is just baffling me. Have you even watched episodes like ‘For the uniform’?

Everything before the 2009 movie reboot is old trek, including Enterprise despite it’s last episode airing only four years before JJ Abrams’ movies were released.

Wait till you get to ‘Far Beyond the Stars’. Exploring racism from the pov of a black man in the 50s is different.

Strange New World and Prodigy are really nice shows though and I can see some old trek fans being very entertained by Lower Decks (including me).

Als Entschädigung für die Zeit in der Untersuchungshaft erhielt sie 16.000 Euro. Lange wurde verhandelt, ob ihr überhaupt zwei Anwältinnen zugestanden haben und ob sie das DNA-Gutachten selbst zahlen müsse.

Alter, was? 16k Entschädigung für sieben Monate Haft ohne das gerade neugeborene Kind sehen zu können ist echt nicht viel, und dann wollte man ihr erst noch was für eine vermeintlich „überzählige“ Anwältin und das von den Ermittlern veranlassten DNA-Gutachten abziehen?
Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen wie ich kotzen will.

I don’t find Strange New World for example particularly violent, even compared to old trek. It is sometimes grittier when exploring how war traumatizes people caught up in it, sure but I don’t think that’s what you mean.

However, that is not what’s being criticized usually. Most complaints about new trek being “woke” is about stuff like the inclusion of a gay couple or nonbinary characters.

That’s socialist propaganda! You see, you cut both apples in half with one cut, everyone gets half an apple and the remaining half is given to someone who struggles affording life.

(/s)

I don’t agree with your point.
First, there’s a lot of old trek episodes basically just saying „X is wrong, y’all stop doing this, please!“
Second, there still is a lot of times new trek shows that working together is beneficial for everyone. There’s even a whole show exactly about that called Prodigy, and it’s really great.

You have no idea how many wild claims my autistic ass has seen that were absolutely serious.

It’s all Old Trek that came before the J.J. Abrams movie reboot.

but it wasn’t woke!

Define woke then, please.

Both is true though. If the fact in the video game was correct, it is how you learned about it, hence it is your source of knowledge. Also, the research material with which you confirmed the fact is a source of knowledge. And if that fact in the video game wasn’t true, then the research material is a source but not the video game.
However, I wouldn’t list a video game as a source when I talk about historical facts but only as an initial spark of interest that led me to research said historical facts.

Yeah, obviously. My original point however is that video games and music are not reliable sources.

That wasn’t Keiko.