robocall@lemmy.world to me_irl@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agome🧔irllemmy.worldimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down113
arrow-up1568arrow-down1imageme🧔irllemmy.worldrobocall@lemmy.world to me_irl@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareLandless2029@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up37·10 months agoFalse. At leat one of these should be holding a fish!
minus-squarepoppy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·10 months agoThat’s not even limited to the 40+. When I was on Tinder I started trying to keep tally of all the guys holding up fish or dead deer heads, but when it was like 90% of the profiles I gave up. (Midwest USA probably skews that a lot though.)
minus-squareTroy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoIt’s probably some sort of sample bias. People who don’t take a lot of photos will still almost always snap a photo with a nice fish. Back when people actually used plenty of fish, it was considered ironic.
False. At leat one of these should be holding a fish!
That’s not even limited to the 40+. When I was on Tinder I started trying to keep tally of all the guys holding up fish or dead deer heads, but when it was like 90% of the profiles I gave up. (Midwest USA probably skews that a lot though.)
It’s probably some sort of sample bias. People who don’t take a lot of photos will still almost always snap a photo with a nice fish.
Back when people actually used plenty of fish, it was considered ironic.