• Mysteriarch ☀️@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Read up on the history of… any emancipatory movement, really. Civil disobedience, strikes, direct action, have all involved some forms of violence (be it so-called vandalism, or direct confrontation between groups). Many in reaction to violence by the state or corporations (Battle of Blair Mountain!). Thinking we will achieve far-reaching goals without resorting to some sort of radical actions is ludicrous.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Women’s Rights. Civil Rights. Worker’s Rights. All we’re in some way violent. The threat of violence is the only threat that causes action. I’m not advocating for violence. I just recognize that it may be necessary to achieve goals.

        • Lyrata@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re also supposing that this climate crisis that the governments are currently inflicting on their people is not violence. And that the police beating protesters is not violence.

          It is violence, and we should be able to defend ourselves.

          • TrismegistusMx@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It blows my mind that more people don’t realize that police presence is a symptom of lack of representation. Healthy, content, and comfortable individual don’t need to be policed. Discontent comes from injustice.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are three kinds of violence.

      The first, the mother of all others, is institutional violence, the kind that legalizes and perpetuates domination, oppression and exploitation, the kind that crushes and crushes millions of people in its silent, well-oiled machinery.

      The second is revolutionary violence, born of the desire to abolish the first.

      The third is repressive violence, whose aim is to stifle the second by becoming the auxiliary and accomplice of the first violence, the one that engenders all the others.

      There is no greater hypocrisy than to call only the second violence, pretending to forget the first, which gives birth to it, and the third, which kills it."

      This is a summary of an idea developed by Helder Camara

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Violence happens to people, not property.

      Direct action against climate change turns violent when the state uses violence to stop it.

      Bringing violence to bear against a situation is how states excersize power, because the power of the state IS literally just the ability to deploy violence.