“The school shooter played Doom on his IBM Personal Computer” vibe all over again.
It’s abuse if there is no one being abused?
As described in the article, there is a no tolerance policy because of the danger of switching from generated to real. Children are not sexual objects. Whoever feels different needs help.
Could AI-Porn not be something that makes actual CP go extinct? I have the feeling that it is not at all about protecting children but simply about hating on the “perverts”.
I sawed the daemons: they’re over on Pawoo constantly sharing their fucking CP. I guess it’s easier to go after artists than catch criminals harming actual children. Had more to say, but it turned into a rant.
What’s even legal in britbong land? I think they tried to outlaw anything equally or more kinky as “girl on top” for a hot minute before there was a big backlash. I have no idea what their “obscenity” laws are now.
