• Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s fuckin’ unavoidable. I don’t use any part of it, except for Marketplace, because nothing like it exists. It doesn’t matter if it’s shit, it’s where the stuff is listed for sale.

      As for the rest of it, I just quit. Conversations I used to have on messenger have moved elsewhere.

      • bystander@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There really needs to be an organized effort from sellers and buyers to identify a solid alternative, which is hard. And post listing about moving off to that platform. A lot of existing ones have their own downsides, and there are just not enough people on them consistently and actively

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    don’t have Facebook on your phone?

    better yet, don’t have Facebook?

    zero sympathy for anyone caught in this, you’ve all been warned for at least a decade on what supporting Facebook means, why get upset about this now?

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      My mom has facebook and also has my photos.

      Unless we can get EVERYONE to respect each others’ privacy, arsoning meta ceo until next one gets scared is the only option.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well look on the bright side. AI is about to become really good at drawing penises under fat bellies.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    No telling what else they do with your pictures once they’re on Meta’s servers. Literal spyware (as if it hasn’t already been for a long time).

    Imagine having your nudes accidentally ghiblified, with the originals stored indefinitely on Meta’s servers.

    • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      God that’s ridiculous… the image hash depends on the image not having changed at all from the one uploaded by the user. If they’re screenshotted and cropped, or sent via a messaging platform that compresses them, they’ll be visually similar enough to not matter, and different enough to have a different hash. So, Zuck gets a free peek at your your nudes, and all you get is a false sense of security.