Not much to add. Other than the IRS PDF is written is legalese…

  • pedalmore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m more a fan of sticks than carrots when it comes to stuff like this, but voters need coddling and this will still move the needle. Even assuming automakers capture the full $7500, that’s pure profit and they’re going to try very hard to sell more EVs. And thanks to the IRA, that manufacturing will happen in NA. You’re absolutely right that it’s a corporate subsidy disguised as a consumer tax break, but it will still have a real effect. I’d rather just have proper emissions requirements drive the change and have a carbon fee and dividend of course, but I think this scheme is still better than nothing.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t have a real effect tho…

      If they decide consumers will buy at X price, they’ll sell them for X and the people willing to spend X will buy it

      If there’s a 7k tax credit, they’ll sell it for X+7k, and the same amount of consumers will pay X and buy the same amount of cars…

      The only difference is everyone is paying their share of those 7k bonuses to manufacturers.

      That tax money would be much better spent on infrastructure or public transport.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is generally why i’m against subsidies to begin with. EVs are worth it without having to be propped up by governments imho.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. EV sticker prices won’t change. The government was just lobbied successfully into giving your EV rebate directly to car companies.