• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ultra book is not a gimmick. Foldable phones are NOT a gimmick. Touchscreen laptops ARE NOT gimmicks. Dear God why does no one listen to us when we say our “features” aren’t gimmicks!?

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I actually love my foldable Razr. I never could afford one as a kid, and the smaller form-factor is actually really nice.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You’re allowed to like gimmicks!

        What makes them a gimmick IMO is that they’re sold as “this will change your life and the way you work”, but really it’s just that a subset of the audience for the gimmickless product thinks they’re kinda neat.

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I got a razr because the zenphone got huge. What I didn’t expect to love are the big bezels on the internal screen (to allow it to close) they stop the fleshy bottom of my thumb from touching the screen, an issue I’ve had with previous phones.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It truly is bizarre to me how smartphone aesthetics have somehow outweighed practical usage and ergonomic comfort.

          It’s kind of like the main “screen rectangle” smartphone evolutionary tree has largely gone down the road of the “Red Delicious” apple, which is bitter, mealy, mushy, has a leathery skin and is a terrible snack overall, but keeps being bred and bought in large numbers simply because it’s the iconic “pretty” red apple.