• Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah this isn’t really an onion article come to life. We need better standards here

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Article says she was a skydiver herself, but she apparently had little to no situational awareness around running aircraft.

    Think she got the shot?

  • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I saved a coworker from walking into a propeller at least once when I worked on the ramp. I noticed he kept getting a little too close without really seeming to notice what he was doing, so I kept an eye on him. Had to grab him eventually. Pissed me off. We worked with Dash-8 aircraft, big ol’ propellers. I raised some questions about it with our boss, so he asked this guy some more questions about why THE HELL he would even be that way, ended up talking to this guy’s mother?? for some reason, who informed him that this guy had a learning disability that we weren’t aware of. It explained some other things about this guy, but it just gives me shivers each time I think about it.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 minutes ago

      Sounds like the guy might be a serious contender for a Darwin Award. But, good on you for saving him, even if it was just to spare yourself the trauma.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Fuck that’s gruesome. Article says she stepped backwards into the propeller. I cannot imagine why she should have been allowed anywhere near the front of the propeller.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      General aviation airports often have little or no staff and only rudimentary access controls. People walking around aircraft are expected to be responsible for their own safety.

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      No asshole, read the article before making such callous comments.

      She was there, on assignment for work. Small airfields are very dangerous, and this type of accident can happen to anyone who isn’t fully focused on their surroundings. Such as a photographer who is taking photographs as part of their job, steps in the wrong direction.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        this type of accident can happen to anyone who isn’t fully focused on their surroundings

        So Darwin award? Swear to god you people will bend yourselves backwards to absolve idiots of personal responsibility.

        She was in a situation that demands focus, had her head up her ass, got killed. Darwin award.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          It feels like none of you have actually read the Darwin Awards website that actually you know, coined the phrase.

          Simply working a dangerous environment and dying within it, doesn’t make it a Darwin Award, not even a nominee.

          She was there to do a job that required a lot of attention on it’s own. You can’t be assigned to photograph skydivers, at an airfield, without having to expend some energy and attention to doing that job.

          By your logic, any of the kids who got ground up and killed cleaning meat processing plants, should have been more aware. Guess they’re also Darwin Award winners, at least by your metrics.

          Darwin Awards are for deaths that are so stupendously stupid and insane, that the removal of their genes from the gene pool acts as a kind of cleanse.

          Such as the guy who stuck a plunger in the shower as a makeshift dildo, held on to the shower curtain rod area for support, which proceeded to break under his weight and impaled him.

          That’s an actual Darwin Award. Not this poor lady.

          • I mean sending ur kids to work cleaning a meat processing plant doesnt sound like a particularly smart way to ensure ur genes get carried on.

            Ur moronic attitude is why our rights are being erased so daddy government can protect you from your own stupidity.

            Are you seriously trying to claim that there would be zero indication your are cm away from an aeroplane propeller. If ur ears, eyes, feel of air movement are so bad u couldnt tell that then perhaps a Darwin award is nessasary.

            • Noxy@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I hope nobody talks this way about you if you should die from an accident.

            • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Holy shit.

              After reading both of your comments, I am left feeling dumber by at least 12%.

              Quick, write about four more of them and I should be good and ready to find my way to a Darwin Award.

      • Makhno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Small airfields are very dangerous, and this type of accident can happen to anyone who isn’t fully focused on their surroundings

        So yeah, Darwin award.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s not what Darwin awards are for.

          Ironically, the fact that you think it is, means if you have an untimely death, there’s a good chance it will be eligible.

            • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              U know what i think …

              The better question is do I care what you think, and the answer is no, not at all.

              But if you insist, I’m sure whatever you’re thinking shouldn’t be too hard to figure out, as there can’t be too many possibilities. What I’m saying is, you give strong vibes of a likely future Darwin Award nominee.