• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why in the world are people paying for this? You can get displays like this for digital photos that don’t even require an internet connection, much less a subscription. Is this how far people have gone in their unwillingness to learn to use technology that isn’t some cloud/app based bullshit? Just put some pictures on an sd card and be done with it.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      My wife bought internet connected frames for family. We set the frames up on a visit and the pictures are delivered automatically to the non technical relatives as we upload new ones.

      That said, I’d never use an echo for this, that’s super invasive.

      • Irremarkable@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m going to be honest. Outside of elderly relatives on the cognitive decline, the “inability” to transfer files to a SD card is nothing other than laziness. Any functioning person that’s capable of making themselves a PB&J sandwich is more than capable of it. They choose to all of a sudden be stupid the moment a computer enters the discussion. It’s a choice made purely out of laziness.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    doesn’t most of amazon’s revenue come from AWS? why do they even keep trying with these stupid home surveillance/advertisement gadgets that no one asked for?

    • manualoverride@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Owning that space in peoples homes is the point, I bought them just for controlling my lights via voice, but the screen started as a clock and weather report and now shows adverts almost constantly.

      I’m looking at HomeAssistant as a replacement but you have to realise that unless you are tech savvy, you probably don’t even know HomeAssistant exists let alone know how to set it up for your requirements.

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Even with home assistant set up, I still have Google assistant handling the voice control aspect. I might be wrong but I don’t think home assistant comes with any voice controls. You still need something else if you want to control it with voice.

        Edit: it looks like there is something built into HA called Assist. I tried it a bit and while the basics work, I find it harder to use than google assistant.

        • person420@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Getting Home Assistant to play nicely with Google without using their Nabu Casa service definitely is a hurdle, but once you get over it, it’s super nice. I ended up just blocking Google DNS inside my network to force all the Google home devices to use my internal DNS to fix the https/hairpin NAT issue. It wasn’t a big deal since my kids are getting older and I needed to block outbound DNS in general since they’re getting savvy enough to get around my content filtering.

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Oh I just paid for Nabu Casa. It’s only $65 USD / yr and it supports the dev of HA. I’m happy to pay for it for how much I get out of HA.